Re: [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/chv: Set min freq to efficient

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 08:46:56PM +0530, deepak.s at linux.intel.com wrote:
>> From: Deepak S <deepak.s at linux.intel.com>
>> 
>> After feedback from the hardware team, now we set the GPU min freq to RPe.
>> If we drop the freq to RPn, we found that the punit was not setting the
>> voltage to Vnn, So recommendation is to set min freq to RPe.
 
>And does it change the voltage at all? Is there really any advantage to
>the extra code on idle? Does efficient_freq really consume less power
>than min_freq when active (assuming a min_freq/efficient_freq busy
>workload i.e. does a workload that would be 100% busy at min_freq
>consume less power when run at efficient_freq)?
>-Chris

 

Power team is reporting ~140mW delta at idle using efficient freq  - definitely significant.

 

-          Gavin

 

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux