Update the hot plug function to handle the SST case. Instead of placing the SST case within the long/short pulse block, it is now handled after determining that MST mode is not in use. This way, the topology management layer can handle any MST-related operations while SST operations are still correctly handled afterwards. This patch also corrects the problem of SST mode only being handled in the case of a short (0.5ms - 1.0ms) HPD pulse. For compliance testing purposes both short and long pulses are used by the different tests, thus both cases need to be addressed for SST. This patch replaces [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Fix intel_dp_hot_plug() in the previous compliance testing patch sequence. Review feedback on that patch indicated that updating intel_dp_hot_plug() was not the correct place for the test handler. For the SST case, the main stream is disabled for long HPD pulses as this generally indicates either a connect/disconnect event or link failure. For a number of case in compliance testing, the source is required to disable the main link upon detection of a long HPD. V2: - N/A V3: - Place the SST mode link status check into the mst_fail case - Remove obsolete comment regarding SST mode operation - Removed an erroneous line of code that snuck in during rebasing V4: - Added a disable of the main stream (DP transport) for the long pulse case for SST to support compliance testing Signed-off-by: Todd PRevite <tprevite@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 25 +++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c index 080cc23..2460d14 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c @@ -4618,16 +4618,6 @@ intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port, bool long_hpd) if (intel_dp_check_mst_status(intel_dp) == -EINVAL) goto mst_fail; } - - if (!intel_dp->is_mst) { - /* - * we'll check the link status via the normal hot plug path later - - * but for short hpds we should check it now - */ - drm_modeset_lock(&dev->mode_config.connection_mutex, NULL); - intel_dp_check_link_status(intel_dp); - drm_modeset_unlock(&dev->mode_config.connection_mutex); - } } ret = IRQ_HANDLED; @@ -4639,6 +4629,21 @@ mst_fail: DRM_DEBUG_KMS("MST device may have disappeared %d vs %d\n", intel_dp->is_mst, intel_dp->mst_mgr.mst_state); intel_dp->is_mst = false; drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, intel_dp->is_mst); + } else { + /* SST mode - handle short/long pulses here */ + drm_modeset_lock(&dev->mode_config.connection_mutex, NULL); + /* Clear compliance testing flags/data here to prevent + * false detection in userspace */ + intel_dp->compliance_test_data = 0; + intel_dp->compliance_testing_active = 0; + /* For a long pulse in SST mode, disable the main link */ + if (long_hpd) { + I915_WRITE(DP_TP_CTL(intel_dig_port->port), + ~DP_TP_CTL_ENABLE); + } + intel_dp_check_link_status(intel_dp); + drm_modeset_unlock(&dev->mode_config.connection_mutex); + ret = IRQ_HANDLED; } put_power: intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, power_domain); -- 1.9.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx