On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:19:39PM +0530, akash.goel@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Akash Goel <akash.goel@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> On SKL the frequency is specified in units of 16.66 MHZ, barring the
> RP_STATE_CAP(0x5998) register, which still reports frequency in units
> of 50 MHZ. So an extra conversion is required in gen6_init_rps_frequencies
> function for SKL, to store the frequency values as per the actual hardware unit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akash Goel <akash.goel@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 1b36d0e..9dcfca6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -4032,6 +4032,13 @@ static void gen6_init_rps_frequencies(struct drm_device *dev)
> dev_priv->rps.rp0_freq = (rp_state_cap >> 0) & 0xff;
> dev_priv->rps.rp1_freq = (rp_state_cap >> 8) & 0xff;
> dev_priv->rps.min_freq = (rp_state_cap >> 16) & 0xff;
> + if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev)) {
> + /* Store the frequency values in 16.66 MHZ units, which is
> + the natural hardware unit for SKL */
> + dev_priv->rps.rp0_freq /= GEN9_FREQ_SCALER;
> + dev_priv->rps.rp1_freq /= GEN9_FREQ_SCALER;
> + dev_priv->rps.min_freq /= GEN9_FREQ_SCALER;
> + }
Shouldn't these be multiplied instead of divided?
> /* hw_max = RP0 until we check for overclocking */
> dev_priv->rps.max_freq = dev_priv->rps.rp0_freq;
>
> --
> 1.9.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
