On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 05:13:41PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 05:11:12PM +0000, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 05:05:52PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 02:20:03PM +0000, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 04:53:01PM +0000, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > > > > Right that leaves the last point in my answer to v3. With that addressed > > > > > this is: > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Hum it seems that we've upstreamed the kernel part without the libdrm > > > > API. Is it time to fix this? Akash, Chris, any objection if I push this > > > > v3? is there a more up-to-date patch that was exercised by some driver? > > > > > > There's no actual user of the proposed libdrm API afaik. It should make > > > a nice drop-in improvement for mesa, but we may need to better expose > > > bufmgr_gem->has_ext_mmap (I don't think mesa needs to care about failure > > > with old CPUs if it only focuses on mesa/i965). > > > > We've cleared that with Dave last time and if there's the kernel API in > > place (because the DDX uses it) then we can upstream the libdrm one, for > > the sake of completeness. > > I meant in terms of whether the API is sufficient for mesa. Next time, I'll actually read your comment :) -- Damien _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
