On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:43:43PM -0800, Marc Herbert wrote: > The bare "Test requirement: modes" message is too cryptic, I had to go and > read the source code to understand the missing requirement. > > Signed-off-by: Marc Herbert <marc.herbert@xxxxxxxxx> Nice one, applied. Thanks, Daniel > --- > > If there is a different message that you would like to push yourself > then please don't mind me - I think ANY message would do. > > tests/kms_flip.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/kms_flip.c b/tests/kms_flip.c > index b843478..cae02e9 100644 > --- a/tests/kms_flip.c > +++ b/tests/kms_flip.c > @@ -1544,7 +1544,7 @@ static int run_pair(int duration, int flags) > > /* If we have fewer than 2 connected outputs then we won't have any > * configuration at all. So skip in that case. */ > - igt_require(modes); > + igt_require_f(modes, "At least two displays required\n"); > duration = duration * 1000 / modes; > duration = max(duration, 500); > > -- > 1.9.3 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
