Re: [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915/skl: Update watermarks for Y tiling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 02/26/2015 04:59 PM, Damien Lespiau wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 04:47:23PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>

Display watermarks need different programming for different tiling
modes.

Set the relevant flag so this happens during the plane commit and
add relevant data into a structure made available to the watermark
computation code.

v2: Pass in tiling info to sprite plane updates as well.
v3: Rebased for plane handling changes.
v4: Handle fb == NULL when plane is disabled.
v5: Refactored for addfb2 interface.
v6: Refactored for fb modifier changes.
v7: Updated for atomic commit by only updating watermarks when tiling changes.
v8: BSpec watermark calculation updates.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx>

---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |  6 ++++
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |  1 +
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c      | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c  |  6 ++++
  4 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 626e6538..1d50934 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -11994,6 +11994,12 @@ intel_check_primary_plane(struct drm_plane *plane,
  			INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_PRIMARY(intel_crtc->pipe);

  		intel_crtc->atomic.update_fbc = true;
+
+		/* Update watermarks on tiling changes. */
+		if (!plane->state->fb || !state->base.fb ||
+		    plane->state->fb->modifier[0] !=
+		    state->base.fb->modifier[0])
+			intel_crtc->atomic.update_wm = true;
  	}

  	return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index 399d2b2..b124548 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -501,6 +501,7 @@ struct intel_plane_wm_parameters {
  	uint8_t bytes_per_pixel;
  	bool enabled;
  	bool scaled;
+	u64 tiling;
  };

  struct intel_plane {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 626c3c2..e0d6ebc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2603,7 +2603,7 @@ static uint32_t skl_wm_method1(uint32_t pixel_rate, uint8_t bytes_per_pixel,

  static uint32_t skl_wm_method2(uint32_t pixel_rate, uint32_t pipe_htotal,
  			       uint32_t horiz_pixels, uint8_t bytes_per_pixel,
-			       uint32_t latency)
+			       uint64_t tiling, uint32_t latency)
  {

Hum, does this compile? I'm seeing an extra argument to skl_wm_method2()
but no update at the calling site?

Not only that, but it even works! :) (Extra argument is there, you must have missed it!)

  	uint32_t ret;
  	uint32_t plane_bytes_per_line, plane_blocks_per_line;
@@ -2613,7 +2613,16 @@ static uint32_t skl_wm_method2(uint32_t pixel_rate, uint32_t pipe_htotal,
  		return UINT_MAX;

  	plane_bytes_per_line = horiz_pixels * bytes_per_pixel;
-	plane_blocks_per_line = DIV_ROUND_UP(plane_bytes_per_line, 512);
+
+	if (tiling == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED ||
+	    tiling == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED) {
+		plane_bytes_per_line *= 4;
+		plane_blocks_per_line = DIV_ROUND_UP(plane_bytes_per_line, 512);
+		plane_blocks_per_line /= 4;
+	} else {
+		plane_blocks_per_line = DIV_ROUND_UP(plane_bytes_per_line, 512);
+	}
+
  	wm_intermediate_val = latency * pixel_rate;
  	ret = DIV_ROUND_UP(wm_intermediate_val, pipe_htotal * 1000) *
  				plane_blocks_per_line;
@@ -2665,6 +2674,7 @@ static void skl_compute_wm_pipe_parameters(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
  	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
  	enum pipe pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
  	struct drm_plane *plane;
+	struct drm_framebuffer *fb;
  	int i = 1; /* Index for sprite planes start */

  	p->active = intel_crtc_active(crtc);
@@ -2680,6 +2690,14 @@ static void skl_compute_wm_pipe_parameters(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
  			crtc->primary->fb->bits_per_pixel / 8;
  		p->plane[0].horiz_pixels = intel_crtc->config->pipe_src_w;
  		p->plane[0].vert_pixels = intel_crtc->config->pipe_src_h;
+		p->plane[0].tiling = DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NONE;
+		fb = crtc->primary->fb;
+		/*
+		 * Framebuffer can be NULL on plane disable, but it does not
+		 * matter for watermarks if we assume no tiling in that case.
+		 */
+		if (fb)
+			p->plane[0].tiling = fb->modifier[0];

  		p->cursor.enabled = true;
  		p->cursor.bytes_per_pixel = 4;
@@ -2709,6 +2727,7 @@ static bool skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
  	uint32_t plane_bytes_per_line, plane_blocks_per_line;
  	uint32_t res_blocks, res_lines;
  	uint32_t result_blocks;
+	uint32_t y_tile_minimum;

The scope of the y_tile_minimum variable could be restricted further,
but well...

Okay, okay, I'm in the old C standard for kernel still.

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux