On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 05:08:37PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > > Just a few basic tests to make sure fb modifiers can be used and > behave sanely when mixed with the old set_tiling API. > > v2: > * Review feedback from Daniel Vetter: > 1. Move cap detection into the subtest so skipping works. > 2. Added some gtkdoc comments. > 3. Two more test cases. > 4. Removed unused parts for now. > > v3: > * Removed two tests which do not make sense any more after the > fb modifier rewrite. > > v4: > * Moved gtkdoc comments into .c file. > * Moved all initialization into fixtures. > * Rebased for fb modifier changes. > > v5: > * Added bad modifier subtest. > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> When resending individual patches pls send them out individuall (this one here has 1/13, but the other 12 patches aren't around) and in reply to the previous version of the patch. These here are in-reply-to the original cover letter, which is only used when adding additional patches at the end. Otherwise resending individual patches creates even more confusion than resending the entire patch series. Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
