On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Static checkers complain that we should probably add curly braces
> because, from the indenting, it looks like seq_printf() should be inside
> the list_for_each_entry() loop. But the code is actually correct, it's
> just the indenting which is off.
>
> Besides fixing the indenting on seq_printf(), I did add curly braces,
> because generally mult-line indents should have curly braces to make
> them more readable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
The unintended indent was left behind and not unindented in
commit d7f46fc4e7323887494db13f063a8e59861fefb0
Author: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Dec 6 14:10:55 2013 -0800
drm/i915: Make pin count per VMA
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 26e9c7b..a76b2ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -139,10 +139,11 @@ describe_obj(struct seq_file *m, struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> obj->madv == I915_MADV_DONTNEED ? " purgeable" : "");
> if (obj->base.name)
> seq_printf(m, " (name: %d)", obj->base.name);
> - list_for_each_entry(vma, &obj->vma_list, vma_link)
> + list_for_each_entry(vma, &obj->vma_list, vma_link) {
> if (vma->pin_count > 0)
> pin_count++;
> - seq_printf(m, " (pinned x %d)", pin_count);
> + }
> + seq_printf(m, " (pinned x %d)", pin_count);
> if (obj->pin_display)
> seq_printf(m, " (display)");
> if (obj->fence_reg != I915_FENCE_REG_NONE)
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
