On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 04:11:33PM -0800, Chandra Konduru wrote: > @@ -11660,6 +11700,7 @@ static const struct drm_crtc_funcs intel_crtc_funcs = { > .page_flip = intel_crtc_page_flip, > .atomic_duplicate_state = intel_crtc_duplicate_state, > .atomic_destroy_state = intel_crtc_destroy_state, > + .set_property = intel_crtc_set_property, So in my internals mail about whether atomic blocks this I've missed that atm we can't do any atomic crtc properties. And I really don't want to slow down the atomic conversion by piling up more legacy cruft first, so I think properties on the crtc like this one will get stalled a bit despite what I've claimed. I guess we need to discuss this in our mtg tomorrow. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx