On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 04:11:33PM -0800, Chandra Konduru wrote:
> @@ -11660,6 +11700,7 @@ static const struct drm_crtc_funcs intel_crtc_funcs = {
> .page_flip = intel_crtc_page_flip,
> .atomic_duplicate_state = intel_crtc_duplicate_state,
> .atomic_destroy_state = intel_crtc_destroy_state,
> + .set_property = intel_crtc_set_property,
So in my internals mail about whether atomic blocks this I've missed that
atm we can't do any atomic crtc properties. And I really don't want to
slow down the atomic conversion by piling up more legacy cruft first, so I
think properties on the crtc like this one will get stalled a bit despite
what I've claimed.
I guess we need to discuss this in our mtg tomorrow.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
