Hi Dave, On to, 2015-02-19 at 15:42 +0200, Imre Deak wrote: > On to, 2015-02-19 at 15:39 +0200, Imre Deak wrote: > > On to, 2015-02-19 at 12:25 +0000, Dave Gordon wrote: > > > On 12/02/15 22:38, Imre Deak wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 11:30 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > >> UMS is no more! > > > >> > > > >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Some machines now won't boot in "recovery mode", which specifies > > > "nomodeset" and therefore results in various important bits of code not > > > being executed. Will we eventually ignore "modeset" completely, or just > > > refuse to load at all if "nomodeset" is explicitly specified? > > > > The driver will already refuse to load with nomodeset for GEN6+ for > > quite some time now. On old platforms UMS would still work before this > > patch, but afaik there was a decision to stop supporting UMS. Note that > > this doesn't mean "recovery mode" or equivalently nomodeset will break > > booting, it just means user space will fall back to vesa/vga or text > > mode. > > Ah, or did you mean after this patch we should refuse loading the driver > in case of nomodeset even for old platforms? That would make sense > indeed. I was wrong here, I was thinking only about the GEN6 MODESET check in i915_driver_load. As Daniel pointed out on IRC in addition to that we also silently fail to load driver in i915_init for !MODESET always, regardless of the platform, so the check in i915_driver_load is redundant. Based on this it's safe to remove the !MODESET parts. --Imre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
