On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 09:03:51PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 06:25:10PM +0000, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > instpm_mode != relative_constants_mode is quite unlikely to happen, so > > we can test it first to use C's && short-circuiting and not test on > > 'ring'. > > > > I know, probably a useless micro-optimisation in the big scheme of > > things, but I'm going to add another test here, so might as well do it. > > If you want to get pedantic, we want to move this to per-context :) Do we? the API is per execbuf call, so theoretically application can change that during the context life time (it'd be silly, but they can). Or am I missing the point? -- Damien _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
