Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Tidy batch pool logic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 14/01/2015 11:20, Chris Wilson wrote:
Move the madvise logic out of the execbuffer main path into the
relatively rare allocation path, making the execbuffer manipulation less
fragile.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c     | 12 +++---------
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c | 31 +++++++++++++++---------------
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 11 +++--------
  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c
index 9a6da3536ae5..3e5e8cb54a88 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c
@@ -866,6 +866,9 @@ static u32 *copy_batch(struct drm_i915_gem_object *dest_obj,
  	    batch_len + batch_start_offset > src_obj->base.size)
  		return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
+ if (WARN_ON(dest_obj->pages_pin_count == 0))
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+
  	ret = i915_gem_obj_prepare_shmem_read(src_obj, &needs_clflush);
  	if (ret) {
  		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("CMD: failed to prepare shadow batch\n");
@@ -879,13 +882,6 @@ static u32 *copy_batch(struct drm_i915_gem_object *dest_obj,
  		goto unpin_src;
  	}
- ret = i915_gem_object_get_pages(dest_obj);
-	if (ret) {
-		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("CMD: Failed to get pages for shadow batch\n");
-		goto unmap_src;
-	}
-	i915_gem_object_pin_pages(dest_obj);
-
  	ret = i915_gem_object_set_to_cpu_domain(dest_obj, true);
  	if (ret) {
  		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("CMD: Failed to set shadow batch to CPU\n");
@@ -895,7 +891,6 @@ static u32 *copy_batch(struct drm_i915_gem_object *dest_obj,
  	dst = vmap_batch(dest_obj, 0, batch_len);
  	if (!dst) {
  		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("CMD: Failed to vmap shadow batch\n");
-		i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(dest_obj);
  		ret = -ENOMEM;
  		goto unmap_src;
  	}
@@ -1126,7 +1121,6 @@ int i915_parse_cmds(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
  	}
vunmap(batch_base);
-	i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(shadow_batch_obj);
return ret;
  }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c
index c690170a1c4f..e5c88ddd8452 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c
@@ -66,9 +66,7 @@ void i915_gem_batch_pool_fini(struct i915_gem_batch_pool *pool)
  					 struct drm_i915_gem_object,
  					 batch_pool_list);
- WARN_ON(obj->active);
-
-		list_del_init(&obj->batch_pool_list);
+		list_del(&obj->batch_pool_list);
  		drm_gem_object_unreference(&obj->base);
  	}
  }
@@ -96,10 +94,9 @@ i915_gem_batch_pool_get(struct i915_gem_batch_pool *pool,
  	WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&pool->dev->struct_mutex));
list_for_each_entry_safe(tmp, next,
-			&pool->cache_list, batch_pool_list) {
-
+				 &pool->cache_list, batch_pool_list) {
  		if (tmp->active)
-			continue;
+			break;
/* While we're looping, do some clean up */
  		if (tmp->madv == __I915_MADV_PURGED) {
@@ -113,25 +110,27 @@ i915_gem_batch_pool_get(struct i915_gem_batch_pool *pool,
  		 * but not 'too much' bigger. A better way to do this
  		 * might be to bucket the pool objects based on size.
  		 */
-		if (tmp->base.size >= size &&
-		    tmp->base.size <= (2 * size)) {
+		if (tmp->base.size >= size && tmp->base.size <= 2 * size) {
  			obj = tmp;
  			break;
  		}
  	}
- if (!obj) {
+	if (obj == NULL) {
+		int ret;
+
  		obj = i915_gem_alloc_object(pool->dev, size);
-		if (!obj)
+		if (obj == NULL)
  			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- list_add_tail(&obj->batch_pool_list, &pool->cache_list);
-	}
-	else
-		/* Keep list in LRU order */
-		list_move_tail(&obj->batch_pool_list, &pool->cache_list);
+		ret = i915_gem_object_get_pages(obj);
+		if (ret)
+			return ERR_PTR(ret);
- obj->madv = I915_MADV_WILLNEED;
+		obj->madv = I915_MADV_DONTNEED;
+	}
+ list_move_tail(&obj->batch_pool_list, &pool->cache_list);
Why is it now safe to do a move_tail instead of add_tail if the node has just been allocated? Was the original add_tail() wrong or am I not spotting some critical difference to how new pool objects are created?
+	i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
Is it worth updating the function description comment to add a line about the returned buffer now being pinned and the caller must worry about unpinning it?

  	return obj;
  }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index 3fbd5212225f..6357f01e6c46 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@
  #define  __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE (1<<30)
  #define  __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_MAP (1<<29)
  #define  __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_BIAS (1<<28)
-#define  __EXEC_OBJECT_PURGEABLE (1<<27)
#define BATCH_OFFSET_BIAS (256*1024) @@ -224,12 +223,7 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_unreserve_vma(struct i915_vma *vma)
  	if (entry->flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN)
  		vma->pin_count--;
- if (entry->flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_PURGEABLE)
-		obj->madv = I915_MADV_DONTNEED;
-
-	entry->flags &= ~(__EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE |
-			  __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN |
-			  __EXEC_OBJECT_PURGEABLE);
+	entry->flags &= ~(__EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE | __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN);
  }
static void eb_destroy(struct eb_vmas *eb)
@@ -1154,6 +1148,7 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_parse(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
  			      batch_start_offset,
  			      batch_len,
  			      is_master);
+	i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(shadow_batch_obj);
  	if (ret)
  		goto err;
@@ -1165,7 +1160,7 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_parse(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, vma = i915_gem_obj_to_ggtt(shadow_batch_obj);
  	vma->exec_entry = shadow_exec_entry;
-	vma->exec_entry->flags = __EXEC_OBJECT_PURGEABLE | __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN;
+	vma->exec_entry->flags = __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN;
  	drm_gem_object_reference(&shadow_batch_obj->base);
  	list_add_tail(&vma->exec_list, &eb->vmas);

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux