On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 01:08:59PM +0000, John Harrison wrote:
> >@@ -1155,40 +1154,30 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_parse(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> > batch_start_offset,
> > batch_len,
> > is_master);
> >- if (ret) {
> >- if (ret == -EACCES)
> >- return batch_obj;
> >- } else {
> >- struct i915_vma *vma;
> >+ if (ret)
> >+ goto err;
> >- memset(shadow_exec_entry, 0, sizeof(*shadow_exec_entry));
> >+ ret = i915_gem_obj_ggtt_pin(shadow_batch_obj, 0, 0);
> There is no explicit unpin for this. Does it happen automatically
> due to adding the vma to the eb->vmas list?
We set the exec_flag that tells us to unpin the obj when unwinding the
execbuf.
> Also, does it matter that it will be pinned again (and explicitly
> unpinned) if the SECURE flag is set?
No, pin/unpin is just a counter, it just needs to be balanced. (Long
answer, yes, the restrictions given to both pin requests much match or
else we will attempt to repin the buffer and fail miserably as the
object is already pinned.)
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
