On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 01:46:19PM +0000, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 07:32:17PM +0000, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> > This function is only used in intel_ringbuffer.c, so restrict it to that
> > file. The function was moved around to avoid a forward declaration and
> > group it with its user.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++----------------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 1 -
> > 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> > index 0631780..0a7b1af 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> > @@ -502,6 +502,68 @@ static void ring_setup_phys_status_page(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
> > I915_WRITE(HWS_PGA, addr);
> > }
> >
> > +void intel_ring_setup_status_page(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
> > +{
>
> I've actually manged to screw this one up. Daniel could you ammend this?
> or do you want a new patch? (fengguang's 0day bot even generated a patch
> for us).
Already squashed in the 0day bot bugfix ;-)
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
