On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 01:13:26PM +0000, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 11 February 2015 at 11:42, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Well just core drm. All the other callers in there that still use > > direct calls to ioctl have some custom retry logic already, so should > > be good already. > > > Afaics intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c has one instance, plus most of the tests. That one is in set_tiling and because of a very peculiar retry semantics of that specific ioctl. Don't ask ;-) > > > freedreno/kgsl ahas all the other bare ioctl calls, dunnot what to do > > about that. > > > s/ahas/has/ if you choose to keep this note. Already reworded since kgsl is the blob library and so not a drm thing. Thanks for your review. -Daniel > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx> > > -Emil -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
