On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 11:58:58AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 05 Nov 2014, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [heavily edited to just show the debugs] > > > +struct drm_atomic_state * > > +drm_atomic_state_alloc(struct drm_device *dev) > > +{ > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Allocate atomic state %p\n", state); > > +} > > > +void drm_atomic_state_clear(struct drm_atomic_state *state) > > +{ > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Clearing atomic state %p\n", state); > > +} > > > +void drm_atomic_state_free(struct drm_atomic_state *state) > > +{ > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Freeing atomic state %p\n", state); > > +} > > > +struct drm_crtc_state * > > +drm_atomic_get_crtc_state(struct drm_atomic_state *state, > > + struct drm_crtc *crtc) > > +{ > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Added [CRTC:%d] %p state to %p\n", > > + crtc->base.id, crtc_state, state); > > +} > > > +struct drm_plane_state * > > +drm_atomic_get_plane_state(struct drm_atomic_state *state, > > + struct drm_plane *plane) > > +{ > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Added [PLANE:%d] %p state to %p\n", > > + plane->base.id, plane_state, state); > > +} > > > +struct drm_connector_state * > > +drm_atomic_get_connector_state(struct drm_atomic_state *state, > > + struct drm_connector *connector) > > +{ > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Added [CONNECTOR:%d] %p state to %p\n", > > + connector->base.id, connector_state, state); > > +} > > > +int drm_atomic_check_only(struct drm_atomic_state *state) > > +{ > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("checking %p\n", state); > > +} > > > +int drm_atomic_commit(struct drm_atomic_state *state) > > +{ > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("commiting %p\n", state); > > +} > > These seem to be rather verbose [1], is this normal or indicative of > something going awry? If normal, it does seem quite noisy in the logs. For debugging screw-ups in the state-preparetion, checks and commit they're fairly useful imo. So definitely valuable for developing atomic drivers. Should we instead have a new DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC to be able to filter these out as needed? -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx