On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 08:40:02PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jan 2015, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It seems in the past we have BDW with PCH not been propperly identified > > and we force it to be LPT and we were warning !IS_HASWELL on propper identification. > > > > Now that products are out there we are receiveing logs with this incorrect WARN. > > And also according to local tests on all production BDW here ULT or HALO we don't > > need this force anymore. So let's clean this block for real. > > > > v2: Fix LPT_LP WARNs to avoid wrong warns on BDW_ULT (By Jani). > > > > Reference: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=110972 > > > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Xion Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > > With the caveat that I have no idea how common the early pre-release > Broadwells that do *not* have proper pch identification are, Generally we throw out all preproduction hacks once production machines are widely available. Which is the case now for bdw, so imo no concern. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
