Hi On Friday 16 January 2015 04:48 AM,
Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
Yes. We need to provide information on the platform's DRRS capability, crtcOn Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 4:40 AM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 02:26:04AM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote:Adding a debugfs entry to determine if DRRS is supported or not Signed-off-by: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c index e515aad..544b4c3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c @@ -2825,6 +2825,23 @@ static int i915_ddb_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) return 0; } +static int i915_drrs_status(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) +{ + struct drm_info_node *node = m->private; + struct drm_device *dev = node->minor->dev; + struct intel_crtc *crtc; + + for_each_intel_crtc(dev, crtc) { + if (crtc->active) {Don't you want to know which CRTC this is? Would this not be better extending display_info with the extra CRTC status?+ if (crtc->config.has_drrs)Also it just shows if panel supports drrs, not if it is enabled... and the current DRRS state (LOW_RR/HIGH_RR). I am working on the same. --Ram+ seq_puts(m, "DRRS enabled"); + else + seq_puts(m, "DRRS disabled"); + } + }-Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx |
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx