On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Zhipeng Gong <zhipeng.gong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Zhipeng Gong <zhipeng.gong@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tests/gem_dummy_reloc_loop.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/gem_dummy_reloc_loop.c b/tests/gem_dummy_reloc_loop.c
> index 335700d..5e0a10a 100644
> --- a/tests/gem_dummy_reloc_loop.c
> +++ b/tests/gem_dummy_reloc_loop.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@
> #include "intel_chipset.h"
>
> #define LOCAL_I915_EXEC_VEBOX (4<<0)
> +#define LOCAL_I915_EXEC_BSD_RING1 (1<<13)
> +#define LOCAL_I915_EXEC_BSD_RING2 (2<<13)
>
> static drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr;
> struct intel_batchbuffer *batch;
> @@ -260,6 +262,22 @@ igt_main
> }
> #endif
>
> + igt_subtest("bsd-ring1") {
> + igt_require(gem_has_bsd2(fd));
Should we really skip this if bsd2 isn't present?
On my GT2:
Test requirement not met in function __real_main179, file
gem_dummy_reloc_loop.c:266:
Test requirement: gem_has_bsd2(fd)
Subtest bsd-ring1: SKIP (0.000s)
> + sleep(2);
> + igt_info("running dummy loop on bsd-ring1\n");
> + dummy_reloc_loop(I915_EXEC_BSD|LOCAL_I915_EXEC_BSD_RING1);
> + igt_info("dummy loop run on bsd-ring1 completed\n");
> + }
> +
> + igt_subtest("bsd-ring2") {
> + igt_require(gem_has_bsd2(fd));
> + sleep(2);
> + igt_info("running dummy loop on bsd-ring2\n");
> + dummy_reloc_loop(I915_EXEC_BSD|LOCAL_I915_EXEC_BSD_RING2);
> + igt_info("dummy loop run on bsd-ring2 completed\n");
> + }
> +
> igt_subtest("mixed") {
> if (num_rings > 1) {
> sleep(2);
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Rodrigo Vivi
Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
