Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Initialize primary plane src/dst coords when reading hw state

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira [mailto:conselvan2@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 4:34 PM
> To: Jani Nikula; He, Shuang; Gao, Ethan; intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  [PATCH] drm/i915: Initialize primary plane src/dst coords
> when reading hw state
> 
> On 01/13/2015 10:17 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >
> > Ander, please see if these results make sense.
> >
> > BR,
> > Jani.
> >
> > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, shuang.he@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
> shuang.he@xxxxxxxxx)
> >> -------------------------------------Summary-------------------------------------
> >> Platform          Delta          drm-intel-nightly          Series
> Applied
> >> PNV                 -1              354/354
> 353/354
> >> ILK                                  201/201
> 201/201
> >> SNB              +1-1              401/424
> 401/424
> >> IVB                 -2              488/488
> 486/488
> >> BYT                                  278/278
> 278/278
> >> HSW                 -42              529/529
> 487/529
> >> BDW                 -1              405/405
> 404/405
> >> -------------------------------------Detailed-------------------------------------
> >> Platform  Test                                drm-intel-nightly
> Series Applied
> >> *PNV  igt_gem_concurrent_blit_cpu-rcs-overwrite-source-interruptible
> PASS(2, M7)      NO_RESULT(1, M7)
> 
> I'm not sure of what to make out of NO_RESULT.
[He, Shuang] It means, we have tried to run it, but it didn't return any testing result (there are many possibility in this case: Test machine hung, for example)

> 
> >> *SNB  igt_gem_concurrent_blit_gtt-rcs-early-read-interruptible
> PASS(7, M35M22)      DMESG_WARN(1, M35)
[He, Shuang] Please use the one in *.out section which is recorded by piglit itself
"igt/gem_concurrent_blit/gtt-rcs-early-read-interruptible": { 
"dmesg": "[ 7857.565015] pci_pm_runtime_suspend(): intel_runtime_suspend+0x0/0x1bc [i915] returns -11
[ 7861.527641] pci_pm_runtime_suspend(): intel_runtime_suspend+0x0/0x1bc [i915] returns -11
[ 7895.526741] pci_pm_runtime_suspend(): intel_runtime_suspend+0x0/0x1bc [i915] returns -11
[ 7897.526694] pci_pm_runtime_suspend(): intel_runtime_suspend+0x0/0x1bc [i915] returns -11", 
"returncode": 0,

> 
> PRTS doesn't seem to have saved the dmesg for this one.
> 
> >> *IVB  igt_kms_plane_plane-panning-top-left-pipe-C-plane-2      PASS(2,
> M21M4)      DMESG_WARN(1, M4)
> 
> <3>[ 8370.823428] [drm:intel_set_pch_fifo_underrun_reporting [i915]]
> *ERROR* uncleared pch fifo underrun on pch transcoder C
> 
> >> *IVB  igt_kms_plane_plane-position-hole-pipe-C-plane-1      PASS(2,
> M21M4)      DMESG_WARN(1, M4)
> 
> <3>[ 8417.687721] [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* too many
> voltage retries, give up
> <3>[ 8417.694032] [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* too many
> voltage retries, give up
> <3>[ 8417.700334] [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* too many
> voltage retries, give up
> <3>[ 8417.706640] [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* too many
> voltage retries, give up
> <3>[ 8417.712947] [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* too many
> voltage retries, give up
> <3>[ 8417.719256] [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* too many
> voltage retries, give up
> <3>[ 8417.727057] [drm:intel_dp_complete_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* failed
> to train DP, aborting
> 
> >> *HSW  igt_gem_concurrent_blit_gttX-bcs-early-read-interruptible
> DMESG_WARN(2, M40)PASS(2, M20M19)      DMESG_WARN(1, M19)
> 
> It seems PRTS also forgot to save the dmesg for this one.
[He, Shuang] "igt/gem_concurrent_blit/gttX-bcs-early-read-interruptible": { 
"dmesg": "[ 8127.156781] pci_pm_runtime_suspend(): intel_runtime_suspend+0x0/0x1bc [i915] returns -11
[ 8135.168107] pci_pm_runtime_suspend(): intel_runtime_suspend+0x0/0x1bc [i915] returns -11
[ 8149.163954] pci_pm_runtime_suspend(): intel_runtime_suspend+0x0/0x1bc [i915] returns -11
[ 8151.178758] pci_pm_runtime_suspend(): intel_runtime_suspend+0x0/0x1bc [i915] returns -11",

Thanks
	--Shuang
> 
> >> *BDW
> igt_gem_concurrent_blit_gtt-bcs-gpu-read-after-write-interruptible
> PASS(6, M30M28)      DMESG_WARN(1, M30)
> 
> <3>[ 7724.684295] [drm:hsw_unclaimed_reg_detect.isra.10 [i915]] *ERROR*
> Unclaimed register detected. Please use the i915.mmio_debug=1 to debug this
> problem.gem_concurrent_blit: starting subtest
> gtt-bcs-gpu-read-after-write-interruptible
> 
> Are any of those known issues?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ander
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux