On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 10:30:46AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 07 Jan 2015, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 02:48:15PM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > >> This reverts commit 371abae844ede392066bfc21202b2e40f4a654d1. > >> > >> This data seems unreliable and causing many issues and blocking other > >> teams and feature implementation. Safest way is to revert that for now. > >> > >> Reference: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88081 > >> Reference: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88039 > > IMO s/Reference/Bugzilla/ Yup, Bugzilla is for bugs fixed by this patch, References: is more for fyi stuff and mailing lists. Regressions should always have a bugzilla, otherwise QA has let something slip through. > > Also > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87671 > > >> Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Kristian Høgsberg <hoegsberg@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Deepak M <m.deepak@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > When submitting a revert please include the cc/submitter/reviewers from > > the original patch too. I've done that now. > > The code agrees with the spec, but the VBT on these machines quite > obviously does not agree with the spec. > > Vandana, I think you're in a better position than us to figure out > what's going on with VBT vs. the spec. > > Daniel, please just pick this up now. > > Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
