On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 01:35:30PM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote: > From: vkorjani <vikas.korjani@xxxxxxxxx> > > New parsing logic for the mipi sequence block for GOP > version 3 and above. The new version of the GOP includes > the pmic, power on/off sequence which are newly adding > to the existing sequences which are present. > > Also, there are new fields which are added in > the sequence to indicate the sequence size. > > Signed-off-by: vkorjani <vikas.korjani@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Deepak M <m.deepak@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Rafael Barbalho <rafael.barbalho@xxxxxxxxx> This sob block is wrong since it doesn't have your name in it. And it has a lot of other peoples name in it who might or might not have touched this. In general after piles of rebases and reworks it's usually better to claim authorship of the thing, acknowledge the original author in the commit message and put everyone with a sob into the Cc: list. Sobs really should document how was passed around, not how it was developed. So internally that pile of sobs makes sense (to chase patches through internal trees) but for upstream submission we can trim them a lot. Note this isn't about your patch here really, I've seen this happen more and more for some vpg submissions and it's getting a bit excessive. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
