wondering if this fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87143 Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 02:09:16PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> We need this for FBC, and possibly for PSR too. >> >> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> > > Hm, this might fix some cursor update failures if userspace only pwrites > and doesn't follow suite with a cursor ioctl update call. Not sure this > ever happens, but definitely makes sense. > -Daniel > >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c >> index 7ef12e8..b8c906e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c >> @@ -1117,6 +1117,10 @@ i915_gem_pwrite_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, >> ret = i915_gem_phys_pwrite(obj, args, file); >> else >> ret = i915_gem_shmem_pwrite(dev, obj, args, file); >> + >> + intel_fb_obj_flush(obj, false, ORIGIN_CPU); >> + } else { >> + intel_fb_obj_flush(obj, false, ORIGIN_GTT); >> } >> >> out: >> -- >> 2.1.3 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Intel-gfx mailing list >> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Rodrigo Vivi Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
