Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] drm/i915: Mark shadow batch buffers as purgeable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 12/11/2014 05:26 AM, Bloomfield, Jon wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Nguyen, Michael H
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 10:34 PM
To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Bloomfield, Jon; Brad Volkin
Subject: [PATCH v6 4/5] drm/i915: Mark shadow batch buffers as purgeable

From: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@xxxxxxxxx>

By adding a new exec_entry flag, we cleanly mark the shadow objects as
purgeable after they are on the active list.

v2:
- Move 'shadow_batch_obj->madv = I915_MADV_WILLNEED' inside _get
   fnc (danvet, from v4 6/7 feedback)

Issue: VIZ-4719
Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c |  2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 11 ++++++++++-
  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c
index e9349e3..9e0ec4b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c
@@ -128,5 +128,7 @@ i915_gem_batch_pool_get(struct
i915_gem_batch_pool *pool,
  		list_add_tail(&obj->batch_pool_list, &pool->cache_list);
  	}

+	obj->madv = I915_MADV_WILLNEED;
+
  	return obj;
  }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index fccfff5..2071938 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
  #define  __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE (1<<30)  #define
__EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_MAP (1<<29)  #define
__EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_BIAS (1<<28)
+#define  __EXEC_OBJECT_PURGEABLE (1<<27)

  #define BATCH_OFFSET_BIAS (256*1024)

@@ -226,7 +227,12 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_unreserve_vma(struct
i915_vma *vma)
  	if (entry->flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN)
  		vma->pin_count--;

-	entry->flags &= ~(__EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE |
__EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN);
+	if (entry->flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_PURGEABLE)
+		obj->madv = I915_MADV_DONTNEED;
+
+	entry->flags &= ~(__EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE |
+			  __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN |
+			  __EXEC_OBJECT_PURGEABLE);
  }

  static void eb_destroy(struct eb_vmas *eb) @@ -1410,6 +1416,8 @@
i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
  			goto err;
  		}

+		shadow_batch_obj->madv = I915_MADV_WILLNEED;
+

Hasn't i915_gem_batch_pool_get() has already marked the buffer as WILLNEED ?
Yes, good eyes. It was actually corrected in 5/5 but that doesn't make this patch okay. Will fix.

Thanks,
Mike


  		ret = i915_gem_obj_ggtt_pin(shadow_batch_obj, 4096, 0);
  		if (ret)
  			goto err;
@@ -1433,6 +1441,7 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
void *data,

  			vma = i915_gem_obj_to_ggtt(shadow_batch_obj);
  			vma->exec_entry = &shadow_exec_entry;
+			vma->exec_entry->flags =
__EXEC_OBJECT_PURGEABLE;
  			drm_gem_object_reference(&shadow_batch_obj-
base);
  			list_add_tail(&vma->exec_list, &eb->vmas);

--
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux