Re: [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: Rebalance runtime pm vs forcewake

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Monday 08 December 2014 11:57 PM, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
From: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Calling intel_runtime_pm_put() is illegal from a soft-irq context, so
revert the crude hack

commit aa0b3b5bb8768c1a6a6788869d9c7015eae7e80c
Author: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue Apr 1 14:55:07 2014 -0300

     drm/i915: don't schedule force_wake_timer at gen6_read

and apply the single line corrective instead.

References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80913
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c     |  1 +
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 18 ++++++------------
  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index 71be3c9..706b122 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
@@ -1402,6 +1402,7 @@ static int intel_runtime_suspend(struct device *device)
  	}
del_timer_sync(&dev_priv->gpu_error.hangcheck_timer);
+	intel_uncore_forcewake_reset(dev, false);
  	dev_priv->pm.suspended = true;
/*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index 46de8d7..38ac389 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -449,8 +449,6 @@ static void gen6_force_wake_timer(unsigned long arg)
  	if (--dev_priv->uncore.forcewake_count == 0)
  		dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_put(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
-
-	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
  }
void intel_uncore_forcewake_reset(struct drm_device *dev, bool restore)
@@ -586,7 +584,6 @@ void gen6_gt_force_wake_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int fw_engine)
  void gen6_gt_force_wake_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int fw_engine)
  {
  	unsigned long irqflags;
-	bool delayed = false;
if (!dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_put)
  		return;
@@ -603,21 +600,19 @@ void gen6_gt_force_wake_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int fw_engine)
  		goto out;
  	}
-
  	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
  	WARN_ON(!dev_priv->uncore.forcewake_count);
if (--dev_priv->uncore.forcewake_count == 0) {
  		dev_priv->uncore.forcewake_count++;
-		delayed = true;
  		mod_timer_pinned(&dev_priv->uncore.force_wake_timer,
  				 jiffies + 1);
  	}
+
  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
out:
-	if (!delayed)
-		intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
+	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
  }
void assert_force_wake_inactive(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
@@ -777,12 +772,11 @@ gen6_read##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, off_t reg, bool trace) { \
  	    NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE((dev_priv), (reg))) { \
  		dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_get(dev_priv, \
  						      FORCEWAKE_ALL); \
-		val = __raw_i915_read##x(dev_priv, reg); \
-		dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_put(dev_priv, \
-						      FORCEWAKE_ALL); \
-	} else { \
-		val = __raw_i915_read##x(dev_priv, reg); \
+		dev_priv->uncore.forcewake_count++; \
+		mod_timer_pinned(&dev_priv->uncore. , \
+				 jiffies + 1); \

why timer, we can do a put after register read right?

Other changes looks fine to me
Reviewed-by: Deepak S <deepak.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

  	} \
+	val = __raw_i915_read##x(dev_priv, reg); \
  	hsw_unclaimed_reg_debug(dev_priv, reg, true, false); \
  	REG_READ_FOOTER; \
  }

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux