On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 12:59:08PM +0000, John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> There is a workaround for a hardware bug when reading the seqno from the status
> page. The bug does not exist on VLV however, the workaround was still being
> applied.
Given how much trouble the missed seqno fun cause us I'd like more
justification. What kind of (stress)-testing has been done here? And
you're sure you've never seen the little dmesg notice that the kernel
switched to polling?
-Daniel
>
> Change-Id: Ic781fdb31e1f794ce1fa8a6d0d5ee379756c5db6
> Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index 3887f1a..f990ce4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -2367,7 +2367,10 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
> ring->irq_get = gen6_ring_get_irq;
> ring->irq_put = gen6_ring_put_irq;
> ring->irq_enable_mask = GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT;
> - ring->get_seqno = gen6_ring_get_seqno;
> + if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev))
> + ring->get_seqno = ring_get_seqno;
> + else
> + ring->get_seqno = gen6_ring_get_seqno;
> ring->set_seqno = ring_set_seqno;
> if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev)) {
> ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync;
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
