We may be hidding bugs by doing that, so let remove it and have the actual mask value shine through, for better or worse. Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c index 4f63c39..c715ef0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c @@ -734,10 +734,10 @@ static int wa_add(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, } #define WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(addr, mask) \ - WA_REG(addr, (mask) & 0xffff, _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(mask)) + WA_REG(addr, (mask), _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(mask)) #define WA_CLR_BIT_MASKED(addr, mask) \ - WA_REG(addr, (mask) & 0xffff, _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(mask)) + WA_REG(addr, (mask), _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(mask)) #define WA_SET_FIELD_MASKED(addr, mask, value) \ WA_REG(addr, mask, _MASKED_FIELD(mask, value)) -- 1.8.3.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
