On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:19:24PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 05:33:24PM +0000, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > When playing around with debugfs and a HSW machine I noticed that we > > were displaying some garbled value in i915_ddb_info. This debugfs file > > is only meaningful for gen9+, so don't display anything on earlier > > platforms. > > > > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > > index 6c16939..d0e445e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > > @@ -2743,6 +2743,9 @@ static int i915_ddb_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) > > enum pipe pipe; > > int plane; > > > > + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 9) > > + return 0; > > -ENODEV or somesuch? But I guess we're not too consistent how we deal > with such things, so seems OK as is too: > > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx