On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 01:20:06PM +0530, Singh, Gaurav K wrote: > > On 11/24/2014 2:31 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: > >On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, "Singh, Gaurav K" <gaurav.k.singh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>Hi Jani, > >> > >>Thanks for the review comments. > >> > >>Regarding the first 2 patches, I was doing almost the same thing in my > >>3rd and 4th patch. But your patches are more generic. > >> > >>Regarding the 3rd patch, I have a comment: > >> > >>Since in case of dual link panels, few panels may require sequence to be > >>sent only on Port A or Port C or both. In that case, > >>for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports) will cause it to be sent to > >>both ports. > >>To resolve this, in the earlier patches, intel_dsi->port was used which > >>gets calculated to either 0 or 1 in mipi_exec_send_packet(). This value > >>of 0 or 1 is dependent on sequence block#53. > >> > >> From now on as we will be using the _PORT3() macro for using proper > >>MIPI regs, then for this scenario, we may need to have some > >>workaround/hardcode type of code again. May I know your suggestion on this? > >Perhaps patch 3/3 was a bad place for the for_each_dsi_port example - it > >should have been put into intel_dsi.c. Maybe you'll need to add the port > >as parameter to the functions in intel_dsi_cmd.c, and let the caller > >decide which port should be used? I want to avoid any platform/panel > >specific special casing in intel_dsi.c and intel_dsi_cmd.c. > > > >I think the general case for for_each_dsi_port is in intel_dsi.c anyway. > > > >BR, > >Jani. > Jani, > > I have taken care of this in the next version of dual link patches. PATCH > 3/3 need not be merged as it has already been taken care as part of dual > link implementation. Once your first two patches gets merged in > drm-intel-nightly branch, I can push the next version of dual link patches > for review. > > With regards, Both patches merged, thanks. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx