On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Daniel: Should I fold the WARN_ON patch into my patch series and repost? Nope I'll wrestle while applying. >> Chris: Are you saying that you want an extra patch to rename >> 'drm_i915_gem_request' to 'drm_i915_request' throughout the entire >> driver? > > Not even struct drm_i915_request, just struct i915_request and friends. Imo let's settle things first a bit, rename fests can be easily done with cocci. But yeah dropping the drm_ and gem_ prefixes sounds like a good idea for all the request handling. We want to reuse requests for SVM direct submission, which is totally not going to look like gem at all. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
