Re: [PATCH v3 06/28] drm/i915: Ensure requests stick around during waits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



NB: The v3 update was to fold in a new patch for asynchronous shrinker shenanigans. Unfortunately, the new patch was not actually valid at this point in the patch series, thus this patch now breaks the build until a later patch in the series fixes it up again! I'll post out an updated v4 set with the order re-worked so that it still builds and runs at each step along the way...


On 24/11/2014 18:49, John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx>

Added reference counting of the request structure around __wait_seqno() calls.
This is a precursor to updating the wait code itself to take the request rather
than a seqno. At that point, it would be a Bad Idea for a request object to be
retired and freed while the wait code is still using it.

v3:

Note that even though the mutex lock is held during a call to i915_wait_seqno(),
it is still necessary to explicitly bump the reference count. It appears that
the shrinker can asynchronously retire items even though the mutex is locked.

For: VIZ-4377
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Daniel <Thomas.Daniel@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |   28 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 9ac9157..71303a1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -1333,8 +1333,11 @@ i915_wait_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, uint32_t seqno)
  		return ret;
reset_counter = atomic_read(&dev_priv->gpu_error.reset_counter);
-	return __i915_wait_seqno(ring, seqno, reset_counter, interruptible,
-				 NULL, NULL);
+	i915_gem_request_reference(req);
+	ret = __i915_wait_seqno(ring, seqno, reset_counter, interruptible,
+				NULL, NULL);
+	i915_gem_request_unreference(req);
+	return ret;
  }
static int
@@ -1417,10 +1420,12 @@ i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__nonblocking(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
  		return ret;
reset_counter = atomic_read(&dev_priv->gpu_error.reset_counter);
+	i915_gem_request_reference(req);
  	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
  	ret = __i915_wait_seqno(ring, seqno, reset_counter, true, NULL,
  				file_priv);
  	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+	i915_gem_request_unreference(req);
  	if (ret)
  		return ret;
@@ -2920,6 +2925,7 @@ i915_gem_wait_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
  	struct drm_i915_gem_wait *args = data;
  	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
+	struct drm_i915_gem_request *req;
  	struct intel_engine_cs *ring = NULL;
  	unsigned reset_counter;
  	u32 seqno = 0;
@@ -2946,7 +2952,8 @@ i915_gem_wait_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
  	if (!obj->active || !obj->last_read_req)
  		goto out;
- seqno = i915_gem_request_get_seqno(obj->last_read_req);
+	req = obj->last_read_req;
+	seqno = i915_gem_request_get_seqno(req);
  	WARN_ON(seqno == 0);
  	ring = obj->ring;
@@ -2960,10 +2967,15 @@ i915_gem_wait_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file) drm_gem_object_unreference(&obj->base);
  	reset_counter = atomic_read(&dev_priv->gpu_error.reset_counter);
+	i915_gem_request_reference(req);
  	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
- return __i915_wait_seqno(ring, seqno, reset_counter, true,
-				 &args->timeout_ns, file->driver_priv);
+	ret = __i915_wait_seqno(ring, seqno, reset_counter, true, &args->timeout_ns,
+			   file->driver_priv);
+	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+	i915_gem_request_unreference(req);
+	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+	return ret;
out:
  	drm_gem_object_unreference(&obj->base);
@@ -4122,6 +4134,8 @@ i915_gem_ring_throttle(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file)
  		target = request;
  	}
  	reset_counter = atomic_read(&dev_priv->gpu_error.reset_counter);
+	if (target)
+		i915_gem_request_reference(target);
  	spin_unlock(&file_priv->mm.lock);
if (target == NULL)
@@ -4133,6 +4147,10 @@ i915_gem_ring_throttle(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file)
  	if (ret == 0)
  		queue_delayed_work(dev_priv->wq, &dev_priv->mm.retire_work, 0);
+ mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+	i915_gem_request_unreference(target);
+	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+
  	return ret;
  }

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux