Since active function on VLV immediately activate PSR let's give more
time for idleness.
v2: Rebase over intel_psr.c and fix typo.
v3: s/psr/PSR on comment (by Durgadoss)
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
index dd0e6e0..57bf6d4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -597,6 +597,11 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_device *dev,
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
struct drm_crtc *crtc;
enum pipe pipe;
+ /* On HSW/BDW Hardware controls idle_frames to go to PSR entry state
+ * However on VLV we go to PSR active state with PSR work. So let's
+ * wait more time and let the user experience smooth enough.
+ */
+ int delay = msecs_to_jiffies(HAS_DDI(dev) ? 100 : 5000);
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
@@ -631,7 +636,7 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_device *dev,
if (!dev_priv->psr.active && !dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits)
schedule_delayed_work(&dev_priv->psr.work,
- msecs_to_jiffies(100));
+ msecs_to_jiffies(delay));
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
}
--
1.9.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
