On 18 Nov 2014 19:15:18 -0800 shuang.he@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang.he@xxxxxxxxx) > -------------------------------------Summary------------------------------------- > Platform: baseline_drm_intel_nightly_pass_rate->patch_applied_pass_rate > BYT: pass/total=290/290->290/290 > PNV: pass/total=362/362->362/362 > ILK: pass/total=381/381->379/381 > IVB: pass/total=522/559->522/559 > SNB: pass/total=444/444->444/444 > HSW: pass/total=595/595->595/595 > BDW: pass/total=436/436->436/436 > -------------------------------------Detailed------------------------------------- > test_platform: test_suite, test_case, result_with_drm_intel_nightly(count, machine_id...)...->result_with_patch_applied(count, machine_id)... > ILK: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_kms_flip_flip-vs-wf_vblank-interruptible, DMESG_WARN(2, M26)PASS(2, M37M26) -> DMESG_WARN(1, M26)PASS(3, M26) > ILK: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_kms_flip_single-buffer-flip-vs-dpms-off-vs-modeset, DMESG_WARN(1, M26)PASS(3, M37M26) -> DMESG_WARN(1, M26)PASS(3, M26) Looks like these two tests are flakey; this patch shouldn't affect those cases. Do we have bugs open for these subtests already? Thanks, -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
