On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 03:41:05PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote: > Atm we first enable the RPS interrupts then we clear any pending ones. > By this we could lose an interrupt arriving after we unmasked it. This > may not be a problem as the caller should handle such a race, but logic > still calls for the opposite order. Also we can delay enabling the > interrupts until after all the RPS initialization is ready with the > following order: > 0. disable left-over RPS > 1. clear any pending RPS interrupts > 2. initialize RPS > 3. enable RPS interrupts -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
