As obj->map_and_fenceable computation has changed to only be set when the object is bound inside the global GTT (and is suitable aligned to a fence region) we need to accommodate those changes when the tiling is adjusted. The easiest solution is to unbind from the global GTT if we are currently fenceable, but will not be after the tiling change. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85896 Tested-by: huax.lu@xxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c | 19 +++---------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c index 749ab485569e..cd7f4734c9f8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c @@ -375,22 +375,9 @@ i915_gem_set_tiling(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, * has to also include the unfenced register the GPU uses * whilst executing a fenced command for an untiled object. */ - - obj->map_and_fenceable = - !i915_gem_obj_ggtt_bound(obj) || - (i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(obj) + - obj->base.size <= dev_priv->gtt.mappable_end && - i915_gem_object_fence_ok(obj, args->tiling_mode)); - - /* Rebind if we need a change of alignment */ - if (!obj->map_and_fenceable) { - u32 unfenced_align = - i915_gem_get_gtt_alignment(dev, obj->base.size, - args->tiling_mode, - false); - if (i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(obj) & (unfenced_align - 1)) - ret = i915_gem_object_ggtt_unbind(obj); - } + if (obj->map_and_fenceable && + !i915_gem_object_fence_ok(obj, args->tiling_mode)) + ret = i915_gem_object_ggtt_unbind(obj); if (ret == 0) { obj->fence_dirty = -- 2.1.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
