On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 10:50:55AM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2014-11-03 8:29 GMT-02:00 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>: > >> If we're also interested on DDI platforms, we need to check for > >> INTEL_OUTPUT_UNKNOWN here too. I guess Daniel could add this while > >> applying the patch... > > > > Adding UNKNOWN here smells like a massive hack. > > Why? Someone will reuse UNKOWN for something else than DDI. > > > Can't we add a new > > OUTPUT_DDI type, which together with the ddi personality stuff dtrt? > > Or we can rename INTEL_OUTPUT_UNKNOWN to INTEL_OUTPUT_DDI_DISCONNECTED > so it smells less hacky to you? Yeah that works, too. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
