Re: [RFC 3/5] drm/i915: Infrastructure for supporting different GGTT views per object

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 11/03/2014 05:35 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Anyway, that's why I didn't bother with polishing the enums etc. :)

Well I think if we do add some new abstraction it should be polished.
The point of abstraction is to hide details, and that's only possible
if the abstraction is clean&polished and doesn't leak in any
direction. Given that I've mastered in advanced abstract nonsene (i.e.
math) I might have a bit a screwed view here ;-)

Don't think we were on the same page there. I just said I didn't bother with polish (int vs enum) _while_ the whole thing is in the design RFC stage. Not that it doesn't need to be polished when it's done.

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux