From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx> An earlier commit (c8725f3dc0911d4354315a65150aecd8b7d0d74a: Do not call retire_requests from wait_for_rendering) removed the use of the ring parameter within wait_rendering__tail() but did not remove the parameter itself. As the plan is to remove obj->ring which is where this parameter comes from, it is simpler to just remove the parameter completely than to update it with a new source. For: VIZ-4377 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx> CC: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> CC: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index 7e91978..c2456c2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c @@ -1281,8 +1281,7 @@ i915_wait_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, uint32_t seqno) } static int -i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, - struct intel_engine_cs *ring) +i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) { if (!obj->active) return 0; @@ -1319,7 +1318,7 @@ i915_gem_object_wait_rendering(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, if (ret) return ret; - return i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(obj, ring); + return i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(obj); } /* A nonblocking variant of the above wait. This is a highly dangerous routine @@ -1359,7 +1358,7 @@ i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__nonblocking(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, if (ret) return ret; - return i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(obj, ring); + return i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(obj); } /** -- 1.7.9.5 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx