Re: [RFC 20/21] drm/i915: Convert 'ring_idle()' to use requests not seqnos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19/10/2014 15:09, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 03:15:24PM +0100, John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx>

For: VIZ-4377
Signed-off-by: John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx
We have places that shovel stuff onto the ring without an explicit
add_request. Or at least we've had, so this needs a full audit, and that
audit needs to be in the commit message.
-Daniel
Not sure what you mean. There is no functional change here. The old version pulled the seqno out of the last request entry in the list and compared that to the hardware seqno value to check for completion. The new version gets the same request entry and does the same completion test, just in request parlance. If commands are being dumped on the ring without an request being added to the request list then the old version would still not have been checking for them. It would still only look at the last piece of work that actually did call add_request and see if that has completed or not.

---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c |   12 ++++++------
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 4847ed5..c2a7127 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -3030,18 +3030,18 @@ static void gen8_disable_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe)
  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags);
  }
-static u32
-ring_last_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
+static struct drm_i915_gem_request *
+ring_last_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
  {
  	return list_entry(ring->request_list.prev,
-			  struct drm_i915_gem_request, list)->seqno;
+			  struct drm_i915_gem_request, list);
  }
static bool
-ring_idle(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, u32 seqno)
+ring_idle(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
  {
  	return (list_empty(&ring->request_list) ||
-		i915_seqno_passed(seqno, ring_last_seqno(ring)));
+		i915_gem_request_completed(ring_last_request(ring), false));
  }
static bool
@@ -3261,7 +3261,7 @@ static void i915_hangcheck_elapsed(unsigned long data)
  		acthd = intel_ring_get_active_head(ring);
if (ring->hangcheck.seqno == seqno) {
-			if (ring_idle(ring, seqno)) {
+			if (ring_idle(ring)) {
  				ring->hangcheck.action = HANGCHECK_IDLE;
if (waitqueue_active(&ring->irq_queue)) {
--
1.7.9.5

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux