Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Introduce a vfunc for platform-specfic MMIO flip code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 04:47:53PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 04:38:04PM +0200, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote:
> > On 10/27/2014 04:25 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:08:20AM +0000, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:16:06AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:11:12AM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> > >>>> SKL will specialize it.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >>>
> > >>> So with atomic I'd expect that we'd have one giant mmio_flip driver
> > >>> function and that just calls into the relevant platform/plane update
> > >>> hooks. Gustavo&Ville are working on that monster.
> > >>>
> > >>> Now this here seems to add another incarnation. Can't I have just one
> > >>> please?
> > >>
> > >> I'd be happy to have that, but are we talking before 3.19? SKL doesn't
> > >> flip at all without MMIO flips, so we'll need to have of of those by
> > >> 3.19.
> > >
> > > It shouldn't be a lot of fuzz really since it will more or less amount to
> > > calling the same low-level plane update functions for all of them. Or I'm
> > > confused about all this. Also I think Ander is starting to rework
> > > mmio_flip this week.
> > 
> > I did send a patch [1] related to mmio flip last week, but I wasn't 
> > aware of the grand plan for that "giant mmio_flip driver function". I'm 
> > learning the details as I go, so I should probably look into that, but 
> > at least for now I wasn't planning to much more than that patch.
> > 
> > Paulo gave me some comments (off-list, due to the mailman issues) that I 
> > plan to fix and then send a v2.
> > 
> >   [1] 
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2014-October/053792.html
> 
> Yeah so this a step in the direction Daniel mentioned. The other part is
> making the primary plane update func more sane, and split it to
> check/commit phases, which is what Gustavo is working on.
> 
> Once all that's done we can add the vblank evade to the primary plane
> update commit hook. And then there shouldn't be much difference in the mmio
> flip vs. plane update anymore so we should be able to just call the primary
> plane funcs for mmio flip, with the commit done from the wq.
> 
> And the end result is then quite close to what we want for nuclear flip.
> Then we "just" expand it to cover multiple planes in one go and we're
> almost there :)

Sounds like a wonderful future, but in the meantime, it'd be nice to
have flips working on SKL. Maybe with a comment on top of the vfunc
explaning it should be removed once we have MMIO updates for flips built
on top the plane vfuncs?

-- 
Damien
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux