Hi Zhigang, On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Zhigang Gong <zhigang.gong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > Luxmark (both 2.0/2.1) works fine on my IVB machine. The back trace > you provided below doesn't indicate it's a beignet related problem. > It hadn't enter beignet domain and just crashed in luxmark internal. I'm testing with Luxmark-1.3.1. Luxmark 2.0 works fine. > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:04:29PM +0300, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: >> Hi Zhigang, >> >> Luxmark crashes with following backtrace: >> >> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >> 0x00000000004cd8b0 in slg::PathOCLRenderEngine::StopLockLess() () >> (gdb) bt >> #0 0x00000000004cd8b0 in slg::PathOCLRenderEngine::StopLockLess() () >> #1 0x0000000000482236 in slg::RenderEngine::Stop() () >> #2 0x000000000047be9b in slg::RenderSession::~RenderSession() () >> #3 0x0000000000468a77 in LuxMarkApp::Stop() () >> #4 0x0000000000468b46 in LuxMarkApp::InitRendering(LuxMarkAppMode, >> char const*) () > > After a quick analysis, I confirm that the second case is indeed a beignet > bug. Beignet lacks of some llvm intrinsics support such as > llvm.uadd.with.overflow.i32(). > > Will fix it next week. Ok, thank you! > Thanks, > Zhigang Gong. Regards Vasily _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
