On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 04:16:14PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 04:39:29PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:11:11PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > Userspace cares about whether or not swizzling depends on the page > > > address for its direct access into bound objects. Extend the get_tiling > > > ioctl to report the physical swizzling value in addition to the logical > > > swizzling value so that userspace can accurately determine when it is > > > possible for manual detiling. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Akash Goel <akash.goel@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > > > > I wonder whether we should care really, since on gen5+ we know that they > > agree. Pimp some igt (by skipping if needed) to convince me? > > It's for gen2-4... Trivial little change to enable more sharing of code > paths and speedups. > > What type of igt do you want? I personally have never seen a bit17 > swizzling machine, but we know that some do exist due to the bug > reports. I've thought of adding the relevant new cases to gem_tiled_pread.c. But that's for the pread stuff and not cpu mmaps, but copypaste to gem_tiled_cpu_mmap.c can fix that. And the desktop i915g I have here does bit17 - without any L-shaped craziness even afaik! -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
