Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] drm/i915: only flip frontbuffer if crtc is active

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 02:51:34PM +0100, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> There is no point in flipping a buffer for a disabled crtc.

That thing doesn't actually flip but just signal the frontbuffer
tracking code that either has just flipped or is going to real soon now
(tm). But yeah, still makes no sense when the entire pipe is off, so:

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 8530401..9a913f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -8544,9 +8544,9 @@ static int intel_crtc_cursor_set_obj(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>  		if (old_width != width)
>  			intel_update_watermarks(crtc);
>  		intel_crtc_update_cursor(crtc, intel_crtc->cursor_bo != NULL);
> -	}
>  
> -	intel_frontbuffer_flip(dev, INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_CURSOR(pipe));
> +		intel_frontbuffer_flip(dev, INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_CURSOR(pipe));
> +	}
>  
>  	return 0;
>  fail_unpin:
> -- 
> 1.9.3
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux