Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: add missing forcewake put on i915_wa_registers()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22/10/2014 08:35, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 07:40:35PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 02:58:08PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>

Otherwise, a simple "cat" to the debugfs file can make the machine use
much more power than needed, and prevent it from runtime suspending.

Related commit:

     commit 8452e1d173a16d9812422a2272c4ab0f0ba81057
     Author: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
     Date:   Tue Oct 7 17:21:26 2014 +0300
         drm/i915: Build workaround list in ring initialization

Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/debugfs-read
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>

tbh I'm not even sure we want to do the manual forcewake get here -
I915_READ will do it for us, and this is a debug interface. So no one
should care about perf. Mika, is that right? If so I'd like to merge the
inverse patch which drops the fw_get.

Don't we still need the idle msg disable+poll CSPWRFSM trick here on
gen8? That also needs forcewake around it.


I had a chat with Mika on this yesterday and he seem to agree that forcewake is probably not required here. I couldn't send the patch yesterday but as per Ville's comments looks like we need forcewake here?

regards
Arun

-Daniel

---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 9600285..36a4baa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -2671,6 +2671,7 @@ static int i915_wa_registers(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
  			   addr, value, mask, read, ok ? "OK" : "FAIL");
  	}

+	gen6_gt_force_wake_put(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
  	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
  	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);

--
2.1.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux