> -----Original Message----- > From: He, Shuang > Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 10:15 PM > To: He, Shuang; intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Conselvan De Oliveira, Ander > Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Make intel_pipe_has_type() and > > Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: > shuang.he@xxxxxxxxx) > -------------------------------------Summary------------------------------------- > Platform: baseline_drm_intel_nightly_pass_rate->patch_applied_pass_rate > BYT: pass/total=271/271->269/271 > PNV: pass/total=269/271->270/271 > ILK: pass/total=3/3->3/3 [He, Shuang] This "3/3" result is not correct due to bug in PRTS system, I'll fix it Thanks --Shuang > IVB: pass/total=271/271->271/271 > SNB: pass/total=271/271->271/271 > HSW: pass/total=271/271->271/271 > BDW: pass/total=271/271->269/271 > -------------------------------------Detailed------------------------------------- > test_platform: test_suite, test_case, > result_with_drm_intel_nightly->result_with_patch_applied > BYT: Intel_gpu_tools, > igt_gem_concurrent_blit_gttX-bcs-gpu-read-after-write-forked, > PASS->TIMEOUT > BYT: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_kms_setmode_invalid-clone-single-crtc, > PASS->DMESG_WARN > PNV: Intel_gpu_tools, > igt_gem_concurrent_blit_gtt-bcs-gpu-read-after-write-forked, TIMEOUT->PASS > BDW: Intel_gpu_tools, > igt_gem_concurrent_blit_gtt-bcs-gpu-read-after-write-forked, PASS->TIMEOUT > BDW: Intel_gpu_tools, > igt_gem_concurrent_blit_gttX-bcs-gpu-read-after-write-forked, > PASS->TIMEOUT _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
