On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 03:15:04PM +0100, John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> Work in progress for replacing seqno usage with requst structures. > > You fail to end up with my earlier code. Nak. Well I've tried to split up your patch into small independent changes and failed at that. And given how many changes there are in there I simply can't merge your patch as-is. I know that it does seem to fix some random hangs, but with massive behaviour changes like the read-read stuff in there this could very well just be a random fluke. But if there's anything amiss in John's work for the plain s/seqno/request/ change, or anything else that we absolutely need to have then I very much want your opinion on this. But a flat outright nak without further content isn't useful to move forward. Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
