Ville suggested that we should use the same semantics as C arrays to
reduce the number of those pesky +1/-1 in the allocation code.
This patch leaves the debugfs file as is, showing the internal DDB
allocation structure, not the values written in the registers.
Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 14be1dc..0320698 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1414,7 +1414,7 @@ struct ilk_wm_values {
};
struct skl_ddb_entry {
- uint16_t start, end; /* in number of blocks */
+ uint16_t start, end; /* in number of blocks, 'end' is exclusive */
};
static inline uint16_t skl_ddb_entry_size(const struct skl_ddb_entry *entry)
@@ -1423,7 +1423,7 @@ static inline uint16_t skl_ddb_entry_size(const struct skl_ddb_entry *entry)
if (entry->end == 0)
return 0;
- return entry->end - entry->start + 1;
+ return entry->end - entry->start;
}
static inline bool skl_ddb_entry_equal(const struct skl_ddb_entry *e1,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 2a41ae8..016b54e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3038,7 +3038,7 @@ skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_device *dev,
pipe_size = ddb_size / config->num_pipes_active;
alloc->start = nth_active_pipe * ddb_size / config->num_pipes_active;
- alloc->end = alloc->start + pipe_size - 1;
+ alloc->end = alloc->start + pipe_size;
}
static unsigned int skl_cursor_allocation(const struct intel_wm_config *config)
@@ -3053,6 +3053,8 @@ static void skl_ddb_entry_init_from_hw(struct skl_ddb_entry *entry, u32 reg)
{
entry->start = reg & 0x3ff;
entry->end = (reg >> 16) & 0x3ff;
+ if (entry->end)
+ entry->end += 1;
}
void skl_ddb_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
@@ -3129,7 +3131,7 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
}
cursor_blocks = skl_cursor_allocation(config);
- ddb->cursor[pipe].start = alloc.end - cursor_blocks + 1;
+ ddb->cursor[pipe].start = alloc.end - cursor_blocks;
ddb->cursor[pipe].end = alloc.end;
alloc_size -= cursor_blocks;
@@ -3163,7 +3165,7 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
total_data_rate);
ddb->plane[pipe][plane].start = start;
- ddb->plane[pipe][plane].end = start + plane_blocks - 1;
+ ddb->plane[pipe][plane].end = start + plane_blocks;
start += plane_blocks;
}
@@ -3467,6 +3469,15 @@ static void skl_compute_wm_results(struct drm_device *dev,
r->wm_linetime[pipe] = p_wm->linetime;
}
+static void skl_ddb_entry_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, uint32_t reg,
+ const struct skl_ddb_entry *entry)
+{
+ if (entry->end)
+ I915_WRITE(reg, (entry->end - 1) << 16 | entry->start);
+ else
+ I915_WRITE(reg, 0);
+}
+
static void skl_write_wm_values(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
const struct skl_wm_values *new)
{
@@ -3494,13 +3505,12 @@ static void skl_write_wm_values(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
I915_WRITE(CUR_WM_TRANS(pipe), new->cursor_trans[pipe]);
for (i = 0; i < intel_num_planes(crtc); i++)
- I915_WRITE(PLANE_BUF_CFG(pipe, i),
- new->ddb.plane[pipe][i].end << 16 |
- new->ddb.plane[pipe][i].start);
+ skl_ddb_entry_write(dev_priv,
+ PLANE_BUF_CFG(pipe, i),
+ &new->ddb.plane[pipe][i]);
- I915_WRITE(CUR_BUF_CFG(pipe),
- new->ddb.cursor[pipe].end << 16 |
- new->ddb.cursor[pipe].start);
+ skl_ddb_entry_write(dev_priv, CUR_BUF_CFG(pipe),
+ &new->ddb.cursor[pipe]);
}
}
}
--
1.8.3.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
