I didn't notice this on the machine I developed it since the original
wait testcase fails there. Oops.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
---
tests/gem_wait.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/gem_wait.c b/tests/gem_wait.c
index 83ddb97216ab..1320c7b91a9e 100644
--- a/tests/gem_wait.c
+++ b/tests/gem_wait.c
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static void render_timeout(int fd)
if (timeout == (ENOUGH_WORK_IN_SECONDS * NSEC_PER_SEC))
igt_info("Buffer was already done!\n");
else {
- igt_info("Finished with %lu time remaining\n", timeout);
+ igt_info("Finished with %llu time remaining\n", timeout);
}
/* check that polling with timeout=0 works. */
@@ -212,8 +212,6 @@ static void render_timeout(int fd)
drm_intel_bo_unreference(dst);
intel_batchbuffer_free(batch);
drm_intel_bufmgr_destroy(bufmgr);
-
- close(fd);
}
static void invalid_flags(int fd)
--
1.9.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
