Re: [PATCH 66/89] drm/i915/skl: Implementation of SKL DPLL programming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2014-09-04 8:27 GMT-03:00 Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx>:
> From: Satheeshakrishna M <satheeshakrishna.m@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch implements SKL DPLL programming that includes:
>         - DPLL allocation
>         - wide range PLL calculation and programming
>         - DP link rate programming
>         - DDI to DPLL mapping
>
> v2: Incorporated following changes
>         - Added vfunc for function required outside
>         - Fixed multiple comments in WRPLL calculation
>
> v3: - Fix the DCO computation
>     - Move the initialization up to not clobber the computed values
>     - Use the correct macro for DP link rate programming.
>     - Use wait_for() to wait for the PLL locked bit
>
> v4: Rebase on top of nigthly (Damien)
>
> v5: A few code cleanups in the WRPLL computation (Damien)
>     - Use uint32_t when possible
>     - Use abs_diff() in the WRPLL computation
>     - Make the 64bits divisions use div64_u64()
>     - Fix typo in dco_central_feq_deviation (freq)
>     - Replace the chain of breaks with a goto
>
> v6: Port of the patch to work on top of the shared DPLLs (Damien)
> v7: Don't try to handle eDP in ddi_pll_select() (Damien)
>
> Signed-off-by: Satheeshakrishna M <satheeshakrishna.m@xxxxxxxxx> (v3)
> Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 225 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 224 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> index 439cd50..f68e04c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -915,6 +915,225 @@ hsw_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
>         return true;
>  }
>
> +struct skl_wrpll_params {
> +       uint32_t        dco_fraction;
> +       uint32_t        dco_integer;
> +       uint32_t        qdiv_ratio;
> +       uint32_t        qdiv_mode;
> +       uint32_t        kdiv;
> +       uint32_t        pdiv;
> +       uint32_t        central_freq;
> +};
> +
> +static void
> +skl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock /* in Hz */,
> +                       struct skl_wrpll_params *wrpll_params)
> +{
> +       uint64_t afe_clock = clock * 5; /* AFE Clock is 5x Pixel clock */
> +       uint64_t dco_central_freq[3] = {8400000000, 9000000000, 9600000000};
> +       uint32_t min_dco_deviation = 400;
> +       uint32_t min_dco_index = 3;
> +       uint32_t P0[4] = {1, 2, 3, 7};
> +       uint32_t P2[4] = {1, 2, 3, 5};
> +       bool found = false;
> +       uint32_t candidate_p = 0;
> +       uint32_t candidate_p0[3] = {0}, candidate_p1[3] = {0};
> +       uint32_t candidate_p2[3] = {0};
> +       uint32_t dco_central_freq_deviation[3];
> +       uint32_t i, P1, k, dco_count;
> +       bool retry_with_odd = false;
> +       uint64_t dco_freq;
> +
> +       /* Determine P0, P1 or P2 */
> +       for (dco_count = 0; dco_count < 3; dco_count++) {
> +               found = false;
> +               candidate_p =
> +                       div64_u64(dco_central_freq[dco_count], afe_clock);
> +               if (retry_with_odd == false)
> +                       candidate_p = (candidate_p % 2 == 0 ?
> +                               candidate_p : candidate_p + 1);
> +
> +               for (P1 = 1; P1 < candidate_p; P1++) {
> +                       for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> +                               if (!(P0[i] != 1 || P1 == 1))

I'd invert the logic of  the statement above to match the spec.


> +                                       continue;
> +
> +                               for (k = 0; k < 4; k++) {
> +                                       if (!((P2[k] != 2 && P1 == 1) ||
> +                                               (P2[k] == 2)))

This doesn't seem to match the docs. Why is the "P2[k] == 2" there?

>From the bikeshedding department, there's also a minor coding style
problem (missing "*" char in second line of comment) below, and the
usual "is_skl" check leaving gen10+ on the same case as hsw/bdw.

Everything else looks like to be according to the specs.

With or without changes: Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>

> +                                               continue;
> +
> +                                       if (candidate_p == P0[i] * P1 * P2[k]) {
> +                                               /* Found possible P0, P1, P2 */
> +                                               found = true;
> +                                               candidate_p0[dco_count] = P0[i];
> +                                               candidate_p1[dco_count] = P1;
> +                                               candidate_p2[dco_count] = P2[k];
> +                                               goto found;
> +                                       }
> +
> +                               }
> +                       }
> +               }
> +
> +found:
> +               if (found) {
> +                       dco_central_freq_deviation[dco_count] =
> +                               div64_u64(10000 *
> +                                         abs_diff((candidate_p * afe_clock),
> +                                                  dco_central_freq[dco_count]),
> +                                         dco_central_freq[dco_count]);
> +
> +                       if (dco_central_freq_deviation[dco_count] <
> +                               min_dco_deviation) {
> +                               min_dco_deviation =
> +                                       dco_central_freq_deviation[dco_count];
> +                               min_dco_index = dco_count;
> +                       }
> +               }
> +
> +               if (min_dco_index > 2 && dco_count == 2) {
> +                       retry_with_odd = true;
> +                       dco_count = 0;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       if (min_dco_index > 2) {
> +               WARN(1, "No valid values found for the given pixel clock\n");
> +       } else {
> +                wrpll_params->central_freq = dco_central_freq[min_dco_index];
> +
> +                switch (dco_central_freq[min_dco_index]) {
> +                case 9600000000:
> +                       wrpll_params->central_freq = 0;
> +                       break;
> +                case 9000000000:
> +                       wrpll_params->central_freq = 1;
> +                       break;
> +                case 8400000000:
> +                       wrpll_params->central_freq = 3;
> +                }
> +
> +                switch (candidate_p0[min_dco_index]) {
> +                case 1:
> +                       wrpll_params->pdiv = 0;
> +                       break;
> +                case 2:
> +                       wrpll_params->pdiv = 1;
> +                       break;
> +                case 3:
> +                       wrpll_params->pdiv = 2;
> +                       break;
> +                case 7:
> +                       wrpll_params->pdiv = 4;
> +                       break;
> +                default:
> +                       WARN(1, "Incorrect PDiv\n");
> +                }
> +
> +                switch (candidate_p2[min_dco_index]) {
> +                case 5:
> +                       wrpll_params->kdiv = 0;
> +                       break;
> +                case 2:
> +                       wrpll_params->kdiv = 1;
> +                       break;
> +                case 3:
> +                       wrpll_params->kdiv = 2;
> +                       break;
> +                case 1:
> +                       wrpll_params->kdiv = 3;
> +                       break;
> +                default:
> +                       WARN(1, "Incorrect KDiv\n");
> +                }
> +
> +                wrpll_params->qdiv_ratio = candidate_p1[min_dco_index];
> +                wrpll_params->qdiv_mode =
> +                       (wrpll_params->qdiv_ratio == 1) ? 0 : 1;
> +
> +                dco_freq = candidate_p0[min_dco_index] *
> +                        candidate_p1[min_dco_index] *
> +                        candidate_p2[min_dco_index] * afe_clock;
> +
> +                /* Intermediate values are in Hz.
> +                   Divide by MHz to match bsepc */
> +                wrpll_params->dco_integer = div_u64(dco_freq, (24 * MHz(1)));
> +                wrpll_params->dco_fraction =
> +                        div_u64(((div_u64(dco_freq, 24) -
> +                                  wrpll_params->dco_integer * MHz(1)) * 0x8000), MHz(1));
> +
> +       }
> +}
> +
> +
> +static bool
> +skl_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> +                  struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder,
> +                  int clock)
> +{
> +       struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> +       uint32_t ctrl1, cfgcr1, cfgcr2;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * See comment in intel_dpll_hw_state to understand why we always use 0
> +        * as the DPLL id in this function.
> +        */
> +
> +       ctrl1 = DPLL_CTRL1_OVERRIDE(0);
> +
> +       if (intel_encoder->type == INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI) {
> +               struct skl_wrpll_params wrpll_params = { 0, };
> +
> +               ctrl1 |= DPLL_CTRL1_HDMI_MODE(0);
> +
> +               skl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(clock * 1000, &wrpll_params);
> +
> +               cfgcr1 = DPLL_CFGCR1_FREQ_ENABLE |
> +                        DPLL_CFGCR1_DCO_FRACTION(wrpll_params.dco_fraction) |
> +                        wrpll_params.dco_integer;
> +
> +               cfgcr2 = DPLL_CFGCR2_QDIV_RATIO(wrpll_params.qdiv_ratio) |
> +                        DPLL_CFGCR2_QDIV_MODE(wrpll_params.qdiv_mode) |
> +                        DPLL_CFGCR2_KDIV(wrpll_params.kdiv) |
> +                        DPLL_CFGCR2_PDIV(wrpll_params.pdiv) |
> +                        wrpll_params.central_freq;
> +       } else if (intel_encoder->type == INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT) {
> +               struct drm_encoder *encoder = &intel_encoder->base;
> +               struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
> +
> +               switch (intel_dp->link_bw) {
> +               case DP_LINK_BW_1_62:
> +                       ctrl1 |= DPLL_CRTL1_LINK_RATE(DPLL_CRTL1_LINK_RATE_810, 0);
> +                       break;
> +               case DP_LINK_BW_2_7:
> +                       ctrl1 |= DPLL_CRTL1_LINK_RATE(DPLL_CRTL1_LINK_RATE_1350, 0);
> +                       break;
> +               case DP_LINK_BW_5_4:
> +                       ctrl1 |= DPLL_CRTL1_LINK_RATE(DPLL_CRTL1_LINK_RATE_2700, 0);
> +                       break;
> +               }
> +
> +               cfgcr1 = cfgcr2 = 0;
> +       } else /* eDP */
> +               return true;
> +
> +       intel_crtc->config.dpll_hw_state.ctrl1 = ctrl1;
> +       intel_crtc->config.dpll_hw_state.cfgcr1 = cfgcr1;
> +       intel_crtc->config.dpll_hw_state.cfgcr2 = cfgcr2;
> +
> +       pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc);
> +       if (pll == NULL) {
> +               DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe %c\n",
> +                                pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
> +               return false;
> +       }
> +
> +       /* shared DPLL id 0 is DPLL 1 */
> +       intel_crtc->config.ddi_pll_sel = pll->id + 1;
> +
> +       return true;
> +}
>
>  /*
>   * Tries to find a *shared* PLL for the CRTC and store it in
> @@ -926,12 +1145,16 @@ hsw_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
>  bool intel_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc)
>  {
>         struct drm_crtc *crtc = &intel_crtc->base;
> +       struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
>         struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder = intel_ddi_get_crtc_encoder(crtc);
>         int clock = intel_crtc->config.port_clock;
>
>         intel_put_shared_dpll(intel_crtc);
>
> -       return hsw_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, intel_encoder, clock);
> +       if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev))
> +               return skl_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, intel_encoder, clock);
> +       else
> +               return hsw_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, intel_encoder, clock);
>  }
>
>  void intel_ddi_set_pipe_settings(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



-- 
Paulo Zanoni
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux