On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 06:25:54PM +0200, Mario Kleiner wrote: >> The current drm-next misses Ville's original Patch 14/19, the one i first >> objected, then objected to my objection. It is needed to avoid actual >> regressions. Attached a trivially rebased (v2) of Ville's patch to go on top >> of drm-next, also as tgz in case my e-mail client mangles the patch again, >> because it's one of those "email hates me" weeks. > > Oh dear, I've made a decent mess of all of this really. Picked up to make > sure it doesn't get lost again. After all this nice ping pong our QA has reported a bisected regression on this commit: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84161 BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
